Are you in a session with me now? Join here
Tera L. Webb, PhD
Overview For Leaders For Teams For Organizations For Faculty & Education Diagnostics
Team Clinic

Team Clinic Diagnostics

Complex organizational problems rarely sit in one place. Team Clinic Diagnostics examines how people, information, decisions, expertise, and work move through the organization, then connects those relationships with workforce, workflow, climate, and operational evidence to understand what is driving the problem.

Evidence-Based

The Standard Behind the Work

Each diagnostic begins with a defined organizational pain point and uses multiple sources of evidence to investigate it. Organizational network analysis is a core method across all four diagnostics because many organizational problems depend on relationships: who people go to for information, advice, expertise, problem-solving, coordination, influence, and decisions.

Network evidence is interpreted alongside validated measures, interviews, organizational records, workflow evidence, and operational data. Network position describes relational structure; the broader evidence helps explain what that structure means. Findings are strongest when different sources point toward the same explanation and especially important to investigate when they diverge.

— Tera L. Webb, PhD

The four diagnostics

01

Team Effectiveness & Organizational Dynamics

Why is this unit tense, and why do the same conflicts keep coming back?

Why does work keep breaking down between people or groups that depend on one another?

Examines team climate, coordination, information flow, expertise, and informal structure to understand how relationships and dependencies are affecting the team’s ability to work. ONA can reveal overloaded connectors, isolated groups, weak cross-team ties, concentrated expertise, and relationships that carry work across formal boundaries.

Evidence we may use
ONAvalidated team measuresinterviewsrole and workflow evidenceorganizational recordsoperational data
Findings can inform
Team structurecoordinationrole clarityknowledge accesscross-team relationshipsclimate interventions
02

Leadership Behavior & Performance

Why do the same people get the opportunities, and why are good people leaving?

How are leadership behaviors shaping performance across the organization?

Examines how leadership decisions are experienced across the organization through communication, access, resource allocation, opportunities, evaluation, workload, and accountability. ONA adds another layer by showing how influence, information, access, and opportunity move through relationships surrounding the leader.

Evidence we may use
ONAperformance and opportunity recordssurveysinterviewsresource and assignment dataretention and workforce evidence
Findings can inform
Opportunity allocationevaluation practicesdecision rightsresource distributionleadership developmentareas requiring further investigation
03

Work-as-Done

Why do people work around the procedures we already have in place?

What are employees doing to keep the work moving that never appears in the formal process?

Compares formal work with how work is actually accomplished. The diagnostic examines workarounds, informal coordination, shadow knowledge, role spillover, escalation pathways, and dependencies that may be invisible in policies or process maps. ONA helps trace who people actually rely on when the formal process does not support the work.

Evidence we may use
ONApolicies and SOPsprocess mapsrole descriptionsinterviewsworkflow evidenceincidents and operational data
Findings can inform
Workflow redesignownershipescalation and handoffsknowledge transferstaffingtechnology implementationpreservation of useful adaptations
04

Organizational Intelligence

Why do the numbers look acceptable while the same problems keep surfacing?

Connects relationships, workforce conditions, workflow dependencies, operational performance, and relevant external developments over time. ONA helps show whether information pathways, critical connectors, silos, or dependencies are changing as the organization changes. The broader analysis asks whether separate signals form a meaningful organizational pattern and what changed after leadership acted.

Evidence we may use
ONAworkforce and climate dataoperational and quality indicatorsincident and complaint patternsworkflow evidencerelevant external developments
Findings can inform
Emerging vulnerabilitiesworkforce exposurerestructuring decisionsorganizational dependenciesintervention follow-throughwhere leadership attention is needed next

How a diagnostic works

Six stages

The methods are selected around the pain point. Organizational network analysis shows the relational structure of the problem; the other evidence helps explain why that structure exists, what consequences are associated with it, and which explanations are supported.

  1. 1

    Define the pain point

    Clarify what is happening, where it is occurring, and what needs to be understood.

  2. 2

    Map the relationships

    Use organizational network analysis to examine the relationships relevant to the problem.

  3. 3

    Layer the evidence

    Add the evidence that helps explain the network, drawn from what the pain point requires.

  4. 4

    Test explanations

    Compare what people report, what the organization records, how relationships are structured, and how work actually happens.

  5. 5

    Develop findings

    Identify explanations supported across sources and areas where the evidence remains mixed.

  6. 6

    Decide what follows

    Translate findings into specific decisions, changes, further investigation, or measures for follow-up.

Inside steps 2 and 3

Organizational Network Analysis

Used in all four diagnostics

Different relational questions produce different networks — who people rely on for information, advice, expertise, problem-solving, coordination, approval, or influence. A person central to one network may be peripheral to another.

Validated Measures

Team climate · psychological safety · workload · support · relevant organizational constructs

Interviews & Qualitative Evidence

Employee experience · explanations · context · how people understand the work

Organizational Records

Roles · assignments · evaluations · opportunities · policies · decisions · historical evidence

Workflow & Work-as-Done Evidence

Processes · handoffs · workarounds · hidden tasks · escalation · dependencies

Operational & Workforce Data

Quality · incidents · workload · vacancies · turnover · performance · trends over time

The analysis looks for convergence, contradiction, and change over time.

Start with what you are seeing.

Describe the problem, who is involved, what has already been tried, and what you need to understand. The diagnostic approach follows from the pain point, and the work may draw on more than one of the four areas.